Thursday, August 19, 2010
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Friday, August 13, 2010
table tennis world
table tennis Tischtennis tennis tabella bordtennis Borðtennis tenis de mesa tênis meza meja ping pong pingpong ping-pong بازی پینگ پنگ كرة الطاولة սեղանի թենիս tafeltennis stolüstü стони тенис настольный теннис настольны тэніс настільний теніс на маса masa tenisi asztalitenisz пинг-понг taula da tavolo namizni stołowy stoni stolní stolný stalo tenisas Takkyū taggu 탁구 卓球 乒乓球 lauatennis leadóg thábla sa pöytätennis galda teniss bàn đánh quần vợt โต๊ะปิงปอง Tóa pingpxng ٹیبل ٹینس მაგიდის ჩოგბურთი πινγκ-πονγκ tab bwrdd טיש טעניס टेबल टेनिस
Saturday, July 31, 2010
tenergy 05 fx
Tenergy 05 FX - a very light lining for the fourth generation rubber with built-in effect of plywood. Weight uncircumcised sheet amounted to only 63 grams, whereas the classic thick Tenergy 05 1,7 (!!!) weighs 66 grams, Tenergy 25 2,1 - 72 grams, ANDRO Hexer 2,1 - 69 grams.
3. Banal percussion.
Percussion caps was extremely pleasant - no "oak" rigidity, typical of Tenergy 05 is not in sight. On the contrary, lining nice soft and very elastic, the ball is very deep pushes the pad, ideally there is "inclusion" sponge. In terms of softness Tenergy 05 FX very much reminded me XIOM Vega Europe, but in terms of elasticity and catapults - XIOM Vega Pro.
4. On what grounds tested.
The general solution for the ground test chose the well-known, proven foundation BUTTERFLY M. Maze OFF, the more so because their presence was two, so get in "combat mode" to compare the Tenergy 05 FX at once with three pads: Tenergy 05, Tenergy 64 and JOOLA Express X-Plode.
5. Game.
The first thing that came to mind after a few blows - it does not seem to Tenergy 05. As is known, it is best to remember bad - so is the nature of our memory and vindictiveness. So, in my classical Tenergy 05 remembered in the first place is absolutely "oak" rigidity and unpredictable "spitting" bounces the ball in harmless situations. The game Tenergy 05 FX this did not feel even close. On the contrary - a delightful softness and excellent handling. Then, as they later began to clear in the memory of that classic Tenergy 05 were pluses: very strong rotation, a very complex application, stable, confident unit. All this will never disappear and Tenergy 05 FX, and some things (eg, filing) has become even more dangerous for the opponent.
Nevertheless, the main revelation in the game Tenergy 05 FX were two other things.
First, an incredibly high arc of the flight the ball over the net with a very sharp, almost vertical drop the ball on the side of the opponent.
Secondly, totally unexpected, clear sound - "chponkaet» Tenergy 05 FX almost the same as svezheperekleennaya JOOLA Samba and the volume and tonality.
It is difficult to say that this surprised me more, but the first encounter took place in exceptionally clear positive evaluations.
6. Playing with the top rotation.
Roll forward to roll forward - in principle, by taking any of the modern tensor overlap, this element will be stable, otherwise it would simply not serious to consider it as worthy of application. So Tenergy 05 FX «rolling" on the right and left was no problem - everything was clear and in place.
Getting to strengthen the game and make medium-Topspin right to stand and rolling - and is already beginning to find the first features. In the first place - the arc (as I mentioned). For most known to me to make a good lining a high arc over the net was an achievable task, but required some effort. The most comfortable "parabolas" to this test, I was with XIOM Vega Europe - the manufacturer's «big window» was a reality. But with Tenergy 05 FX just do a completely normal standard slow Topspin - and the arc is obtained by itself. Tall, with a fast steep drop the ball on the side of the opponent. The control is excellent, everything goes to a point conceived without any problems. The same can be said about the run-up to the left. Against the background of classical Tenergy 05 and Express X-Plode, Tenergy 05 FX pleases more control ball flight. Good control and then shows Tenergy 64, but it significantly harder to make a good Topspin left the table.
We turn on the powerful Topspin right to stand - and continues to be surprised of their controllability. In principle, I like all in my head there is an item under which the more embedded in the Topspin right - the greater the likelihood that the ball will fly not quite in the place where you want. From Tenergy 05 FX, this postulate is refuted. I guess I can not remember without thinking, when I last gave a series of 9-10 Topspin with FH in the highest possible power, and they are all at the same time flew by approximately the same trajectory in almost the same area of the table. Plus - an excellent lateral rotation, which can easily be varied to your liking and create the additional problem of the opponent. Topspin left on base - no worse, there is a high arc, a strong lateral rotation. Trajectory similar to the maximum per se from svezhepereklennyh JOOLA Samba, and Mambo (do not forget about "chponk" - he just as powerful!). The rotation of the ball with Tenergy 05 Tenergy FX is clearly superior to 64 and certainly not inferior to Tenergy 05. But the speed somewhat unexpectedly found to be higher than that of the classical (!!!) Tenergy 05 and Express X-Plode and only slightly inferior to Tenergy 64.
Then proceed to Topspin on both sides of drinking. Fortunately, a rival - a high-back with "furious» TSP Curl P-1R, so that this test for all the caps go was getting too easy. Difficulties arose in all cases, but in each - different plan. Tenergy 05 sinned uncontrolled ball flight, Tenergy 64 does not always give the necessary rotation for a complex return, Express X-Plode periodically there was no time delay on the lining - the ball flew past on how the movement ended. As for Tenergy 05 FX, then the main difficulty was the lack of rigidity and excessive flexibility to perform Topps strikes at inflated drinking. It is difficult to say how there "wine" lining, and how - the base, but if you talk about it together, then Tenergy 64 and Express X-Plode at Maze significantly better than the "hammer" defender. If the attack drinking strong rotation, then pull it turns out bad, but then begins to play a high arc rather negative role - the defender can be quite easy to attack the ball too high. In general, in this case is a clear need for lining a rigid base to enhance the power of attack.
The last test - inverted Topspin with FH and BH yielded very different results. Writhe on the left had to be focused on moving forward, because the main problem that prevents perform this element was that the ball occasionally flopped into the net. Either the speed a little bit lacking, or stiffness, but the "included" in the attack had to be very thorough. In this situation very well-behaved shown Express X-Plode - more rigid sponge allows more stable to meet the fast ball and well-compensated for flexibility reasons. To the right of such problems did not arise - there was another feature: the huge opportunities for lateral rotation is, of course, great, but they always need to keep under its control. Several times it turned out that I was carried away by the amplitude mahami, against his own will, made a strong lateral rotation, without even being realized. As a result, the ball came back to my same side rotation, to which I was not ready. But I think this problem could be solved just in time training with the lining.
7. Playing with a lower rotation.
Very strong side lining. Particularly noticeable on the pitch - even after my experience playing XIOM Vega Europe and Pro, also has this element as one of the strongest. Tested on several rivals - the vast majority of sparring, has more or less adapted to my delivery closed lower side with a strong rotation, stable "swamped" balls in the stack at least 50% of the innings. Trimming on the table is very different from the classical Tenergy 05. That tries to periodically "spit" ball somewhere at the table or in a grid, but Tenergy 05 FX in the element completely predictable. Manageability trim with Tenergy 05 FX slightly, but still higher than Tenergy 64 and Express X-Plode. The first still too fast for the fine game, and the second - a little tougher than we would like.
Gash from a distant zone updated for me an acknowledged master of defense (his opinion is still to be written in detail shortly). To be honest - such a mockery of gashes on the right I have him tested. By its usual Tenergy 05 I, though with difficulty, but adapted, but the lower the rotation of Tenergy 05 FX - it is simply a disaster. First Topspin I still somehow managed to stretch out, but the second or third stable stone fell into the net.
8. Passive game.
Strong bungee jumping, high control and harmonious combination with the base make blocks on the table with Tenergy 05 on FX Maze OFF powerful weapon. Surpass the combination of my favorite "monster block» XIOM Vega Europe on XIOM Ignito OFF did not work, but picked up somewhere close to it failed. May have prevented excessive flexibility of the base and arilat in its structure. In this regard, I liked a little more Express X-Plode, which is due to more rigid sponge added aggressiveness. But Tenergy Tenergy 64 and 05 were "in flight" - the first because of too high speed, the second - because of lack of control.
If necessary, "damped" ball problems have been encountered - and the grounds and a very soft sponge helped slow down the ball, if it was needed.
9. Passive game away from the table.
Tenergy 05 on FX Maze OFF - quite convenient combination to "spassivnichat" in the 2-3 zone. It is noticeably inferior to Tenergy 64 in long-term stability of return - sometimes do not take well to calculate the velocity of the ball so that he "flew" up to half of the opponent. On the other hand, with Tenergy 05 FX much more opportunity to make a strong drinking from a distant zone, thereby discouraging rival, tuning in to the straight-line "jamming". Intermediate position between them won Tenergy 05 - she lacks the capacity to rotate for power gashes and stiffness sponges and catapults for a more stable return. Express X-Plode also turned out to somewhere near her.
10. Conclusions.
Undeniably - lining is 100% justified expectations. And even surpassed them, because actually I had a definite bias towards classical Tenergy 05 and I am very worried that all the negative qualities it will pass and the FX-version.
All the many benefits I have already lining is described in detail and will not return to them. I will highlight just the feeling that arose in me after I played Tenergy 05 FX two weeks, tried it on different grounds and how to feel. So, the most important in this pad, I would call it versatility. All the quality is so well balanced that this pad can try to put on almost any grounds, and used to achieve very different goals. Put it on fast, malogibkoe base - and uncompromisingly attacked, slaughter opponent from the table and a 2-3 zone, blochte it aggressively. Take a soft solid wood OFF-and suppress rival total control and extreme rotation. Take protective tree, put on the other hand long spines and begin to pull the opponent change the "evil" gashes on both sides with unexpected Topspin afar.
I liked the combination of Tenergy 05 FX with Ignito and Boll ZLC. Extrapolating, we can assume that very well it should play on such grounds as BUTTERFLY Timo Boll ZLF, BUTTERFLY Mizutani OFF, BUTTERFLY Amultart OFF, XIOM Zetro Quad OFF, ANDRO Zylon-Kiso Hinoki OFF-etc
In general, hard to describe the feelings that words - it should be tested.
And finally - a small revue game Tenergy 05 FX on other grounds. This is not a full-fledged review, but simply a short summary, because I'm such combinations managed to play just one full workout each.
3. Banal percussion.
Percussion caps was extremely pleasant - no "oak" rigidity, typical of Tenergy 05 is not in sight. On the contrary, lining nice soft and very elastic, the ball is very deep pushes the pad, ideally there is "inclusion" sponge. In terms of softness Tenergy 05 FX very much reminded me XIOM Vega Europe, but in terms of elasticity and catapults - XIOM Vega Pro.
4. On what grounds tested.
The general solution for the ground test chose the well-known, proven foundation BUTTERFLY M. Maze OFF, the more so because their presence was two, so get in "combat mode" to compare the Tenergy 05 FX at once with three pads: Tenergy 05, Tenergy 64 and JOOLA Express X-Plode.
5. Game.
The first thing that came to mind after a few blows - it does not seem to Tenergy 05. As is known, it is best to remember bad - so is the nature of our memory and vindictiveness. So, in my classical Tenergy 05 remembered in the first place is absolutely "oak" rigidity and unpredictable "spitting" bounces the ball in harmless situations. The game Tenergy 05 FX this did not feel even close. On the contrary - a delightful softness and excellent handling. Then, as they later began to clear in the memory of that classic Tenergy 05 were pluses: very strong rotation, a very complex application, stable, confident unit. All this will never disappear and Tenergy 05 FX, and some things (eg, filing) has become even more dangerous for the opponent.
Nevertheless, the main revelation in the game Tenergy 05 FX were two other things.
First, an incredibly high arc of the flight the ball over the net with a very sharp, almost vertical drop the ball on the side of the opponent.
Secondly, totally unexpected, clear sound - "chponkaet» Tenergy 05 FX almost the same as svezheperekleennaya JOOLA Samba and the volume and tonality.
It is difficult to say that this surprised me more, but the first encounter took place in exceptionally clear positive evaluations.
6. Playing with the top rotation.
Roll forward to roll forward - in principle, by taking any of the modern tensor overlap, this element will be stable, otherwise it would simply not serious to consider it as worthy of application. So Tenergy 05 FX «rolling" on the right and left was no problem - everything was clear and in place.
Getting to strengthen the game and make medium-Topspin right to stand and rolling - and is already beginning to find the first features. In the first place - the arc (as I mentioned). For most known to me to make a good lining a high arc over the net was an achievable task, but required some effort. The most comfortable "parabolas" to this test, I was with XIOM Vega Europe - the manufacturer's «big window» was a reality. But with Tenergy 05 FX just do a completely normal standard slow Topspin - and the arc is obtained by itself. Tall, with a fast steep drop the ball on the side of the opponent. The control is excellent, everything goes to a point conceived without any problems. The same can be said about the run-up to the left. Against the background of classical Tenergy 05 and Express X-Plode, Tenergy 05 FX pleases more control ball flight. Good control and then shows Tenergy 64, but it significantly harder to make a good Topspin left the table.
We turn on the powerful Topspin right to stand - and continues to be surprised of their controllability. In principle, I like all in my head there is an item under which the more embedded in the Topspin right - the greater the likelihood that the ball will fly not quite in the place where you want. From Tenergy 05 FX, this postulate is refuted. I guess I can not remember without thinking, when I last gave a series of 9-10 Topspin with FH in the highest possible power, and they are all at the same time flew by approximately the same trajectory in almost the same area of the table. Plus - an excellent lateral rotation, which can easily be varied to your liking and create the additional problem of the opponent. Topspin left on base - no worse, there is a high arc, a strong lateral rotation. Trajectory similar to the maximum per se from svezhepereklennyh JOOLA Samba, and Mambo (do not forget about "chponk" - he just as powerful!). The rotation of the ball with Tenergy 05 Tenergy FX is clearly superior to 64 and certainly not inferior to Tenergy 05. But the speed somewhat unexpectedly found to be higher than that of the classical (!!!) Tenergy 05 and Express X-Plode and only slightly inferior to Tenergy 64.
Then proceed to Topspin on both sides of drinking. Fortunately, a rival - a high-back with "furious» TSP Curl P-1R, so that this test for all the caps go was getting too easy. Difficulties arose in all cases, but in each - different plan. Tenergy 05 sinned uncontrolled ball flight, Tenergy 64 does not always give the necessary rotation for a complex return, Express X-Plode periodically there was no time delay on the lining - the ball flew past on how the movement ended. As for Tenergy 05 FX, then the main difficulty was the lack of rigidity and excessive flexibility to perform Topps strikes at inflated drinking. It is difficult to say how there "wine" lining, and how - the base, but if you talk about it together, then Tenergy 64 and Express X-Plode at Maze significantly better than the "hammer" defender. If the attack drinking strong rotation, then pull it turns out bad, but then begins to play a high arc rather negative role - the defender can be quite easy to attack the ball too high. In general, in this case is a clear need for lining a rigid base to enhance the power of attack.
The last test - inverted Topspin with FH and BH yielded very different results. Writhe on the left had to be focused on moving forward, because the main problem that prevents perform this element was that the ball occasionally flopped into the net. Either the speed a little bit lacking, or stiffness, but the "included" in the attack had to be very thorough. In this situation very well-behaved shown Express X-Plode - more rigid sponge allows more stable to meet the fast ball and well-compensated for flexibility reasons. To the right of such problems did not arise - there was another feature: the huge opportunities for lateral rotation is, of course, great, but they always need to keep under its control. Several times it turned out that I was carried away by the amplitude mahami, against his own will, made a strong lateral rotation, without even being realized. As a result, the ball came back to my same side rotation, to which I was not ready. But I think this problem could be solved just in time training with the lining.
7. Playing with a lower rotation.
Very strong side lining. Particularly noticeable on the pitch - even after my experience playing XIOM Vega Europe and Pro, also has this element as one of the strongest. Tested on several rivals - the vast majority of sparring, has more or less adapted to my delivery closed lower side with a strong rotation, stable "swamped" balls in the stack at least 50% of the innings. Trimming on the table is very different from the classical Tenergy 05. That tries to periodically "spit" ball somewhere at the table or in a grid, but Tenergy 05 FX in the element completely predictable. Manageability trim with Tenergy 05 FX slightly, but still higher than Tenergy 64 and Express X-Plode. The first still too fast for the fine game, and the second - a little tougher than we would like.
Gash from a distant zone updated for me an acknowledged master of defense (his opinion is still to be written in detail shortly). To be honest - such a mockery of gashes on the right I have him tested. By its usual Tenergy 05 I, though with difficulty, but adapted, but the lower the rotation of Tenergy 05 FX - it is simply a disaster. First Topspin I still somehow managed to stretch out, but the second or third stable stone fell into the net.
8. Passive game.
Strong bungee jumping, high control and harmonious combination with the base make blocks on the table with Tenergy 05 on FX Maze OFF powerful weapon. Surpass the combination of my favorite "monster block» XIOM Vega Europe on XIOM Ignito OFF did not work, but picked up somewhere close to it failed. May have prevented excessive flexibility of the base and arilat in its structure. In this regard, I liked a little more Express X-Plode, which is due to more rigid sponge added aggressiveness. But Tenergy Tenergy 64 and 05 were "in flight" - the first because of too high speed, the second - because of lack of control.
If necessary, "damped" ball problems have been encountered - and the grounds and a very soft sponge helped slow down the ball, if it was needed.
9. Passive game away from the table.
Tenergy 05 on FX Maze OFF - quite convenient combination to "spassivnichat" in the 2-3 zone. It is noticeably inferior to Tenergy 64 in long-term stability of return - sometimes do not take well to calculate the velocity of the ball so that he "flew" up to half of the opponent. On the other hand, with Tenergy 05 FX much more opportunity to make a strong drinking from a distant zone, thereby discouraging rival, tuning in to the straight-line "jamming". Intermediate position between them won Tenergy 05 - she lacks the capacity to rotate for power gashes and stiffness sponges and catapults for a more stable return. Express X-Plode also turned out to somewhere near her.
10. Conclusions.
Undeniably - lining is 100% justified expectations. And even surpassed them, because actually I had a definite bias towards classical Tenergy 05 and I am very worried that all the negative qualities it will pass and the FX-version.
All the many benefits I have already lining is described in detail and will not return to them. I will highlight just the feeling that arose in me after I played Tenergy 05 FX two weeks, tried it on different grounds and how to feel. So, the most important in this pad, I would call it versatility. All the quality is so well balanced that this pad can try to put on almost any grounds, and used to achieve very different goals. Put it on fast, malogibkoe base - and uncompromisingly attacked, slaughter opponent from the table and a 2-3 zone, blochte it aggressively. Take a soft solid wood OFF-and suppress rival total control and extreme rotation. Take protective tree, put on the other hand long spines and begin to pull the opponent change the "evil" gashes on both sides with unexpected Topspin afar.
I liked the combination of Tenergy 05 FX with Ignito and Boll ZLC. Extrapolating, we can assume that very well it should play on such grounds as BUTTERFLY Timo Boll ZLF, BUTTERFLY Mizutani OFF, BUTTERFLY Amultart OFF, XIOM Zetro Quad OFF, ANDRO Zylon-Kiso Hinoki OFF-etc
In general, hard to describe the feelings that words - it should be tested.
And finally - a small revue game Tenergy 05 FX on other grounds. This is not a full-fledged review, but simply a short summary, because I'm such combinations managed to play just one full workout each.
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Tenergy 05 vs tenergy 64 | Table Tennis
Butterfly Tenergy 05 versus tenergy 64
Tenergy 05 vs Tenergy 64 is probably the most searched after query related to looking for your next table tennis rubber. Review about speed, feeling, durability and weight are very useful when you need to choose if you should use tenergy 64 or tenergy 05 or even use both. If you choose both then most people would agree tenergy 05 is your forehand and tenergy 64 is you backhand.
Tenergy 05 vs tenergy 64 review
After using both of these together for about 500 hours of play I feel I know the differences intuitively. To review these tenergy versions you must forget what all the 1 day reviewers tell you. The idea of speed is quite complex.
Tenergy 05 vs 64 rubber speed
The differences in speed a really quite similar and the concept of tenergy 64 being faster than tenergy 05 is quite simplistic although generally true. Tenergy 64 plays fast with punch more catapult and punch close to the table and away from the table. But Tenergy 05 plays more consistantly with a much bigger window. The speed window means you can put speed on almost every shot without worrying whether it will land on the table or not. When Tenergy 05 is driven with full forehand power it is in my opinion just as fast as tenergy 64. The catapulty higher speed of tenergy 64 is related to the quicker bouncier feeling.
Tenergy 05 vs tenergy 64 feeling
Because the pips of tenergy 64 are set out with more space between them, it means you will feel the ball hit the blade more, hit it harder and leave the blade quicker than the denser dispersion of pimples in tenergy 05. Both these Tenergy rubbers feel the ball almost never slips in horizontal looping. But the longer dwell time gives the tenergy 05 the feeling you can spin almost anything. The tenergy 64 often has a bit too much speed and catapult.
Tenergy 05 vs tenergy 64 durability
Now that you know that tenergy 64 is much bouncier, because of less pimples, because you smash or punch more into the blade there will be more damage to any softer rubber. I have noticed and many others have reported the same thing to me, that Butterfly tenergy 05 becomes very similar to tenergy 64 after a few months. Where as tenergy 64 for the players who love it, they say that their t64 plays so magically in the first month and then tends to lose a lot of its intitial bounce and feeling. It is pretty easy to imagine that the tenergy 64 has less supporting posts or pillars making it more fragile like a bridge with less posts. The topsheet quality does not seem any different in either of the tenergy sheets.
Tenergy 05 vs tenergy 64 weight
The weight of tenergy 05 is obviously a couple of grams heavier because it has more pips. Making tenergy 64 the better choice for people who look for the lightest possible set up.
I will write more about this topic shortly, especially if anyone posts comments on specifics they would like me to answer about.
via tenergy05.com
butterfly tenergy why does it feel softer
The weird thing about butterfly tenergy is the big "why". Does it spin up more because it is harder than fx? It doesn't feel softer than the fx and everything says softer should be spinner but butterfly tenergy 05 although doesn't feel softer definitely spins more.
Saturday, July 24, 2010
timo boll has not played for 2 weeks
The idleness is over. Tomorrow is the worst time of year go again: The preparation for the new season. Oh, it was sometimes nice to put the bat for two weeks out of hand. In my free time I have played tennis a few times and done some mountain biking, otherwise I am sometimes regenerates properly.
Now it has again really feel like the "club to swing" and to torture themselves, but to go right to the limit hurts forever.
Tomorrow I fly with the national team after Faak am See in Carinthia / Austria. There we have everything we need, mountains and sea in order to nail condition, but also a good hall to get our feeling for the ball again, because after almost two weeks to catch back on at 0:00!
Now it has again really feel like the "club to swing" and to torture themselves, but to go right to the limit hurts forever.
Tomorrow I fly with the national team after Faak am See in Carinthia / Austria. There we have everything we need, mountains and sea in order to nail condition, but also a good hall to get our feeling for the ball again, because after almost two weeks to catch back on at 0:00!
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Tenergy 05 | Table Tennis
Tenergy 05 | Table Tennis
I just love how you can find Tenergy 05 auf Deustche in German and see the tenergy 05 cover. They discuss illegal table tennis tuning of tenergy 05 and questions such as Do you think tenergy 05 is worth the price? are surveryed. Other rubbers are compared to such as in the Hexer vs Tenergy 05 battle. All we want is an Honest Table Tennis Tenergy 05 review. We look at Japanese vs Chinese rubbers in Tenergy 05 vs DHS Hurricane III 3 Neo table tennis rubber. Also famous players such as William Henzell The best Australian Table Tennis Player reviews Tenergy 05 vs Tensors. There are some new products such as butterfly tenergy 05 fx and a look at spin art pips and sponge. finally tenergy will be around for a long time because of tenergy 05 durability
Monday, July 19, 2010
Tenergy 05 vs tenergy 64 | Table Tennis
Tenergy 05 vs tenergy 64 review
After using both of these together for about 500 hours of play I feel I know the differences intuitively. To review these tenergy versions you must forget what all the 1 day reviewers tell you. The idea of speed is quite complex.
Tenergy 05 vs tenergy 64 weight
The weight of tenergy 05 is obviously a couple of grams heavier because it has more pips. Making tenergy 64 the better choice for people who look for the lightest possible set up.
I will write more about this topic shortly, especially if anyone posts comments on specifics they would like me to answer about.
via tenergy05.com
Saturday, July 17, 2010
butterfly tenergy
Many people ask What is the throw angle of tenergy butterfly? Well throw angle depends on the spin which related to the density. You can estimate tenergy sponge rubber mass thanks to Daniel Tan's database. Others ask Is Tenergy too advanced? because they have trouble Looping Heavy Underspin with Tenergy. But you can change the thickness of the sponge because you just need to ask What is the difference between Tenergy 1.7 1.9 2.1? Well that is different for everyone. You should think Which Butterfly Tenergy thickness is best for your game? I wouldn't go to thin because tenergy is nothing without spring sponge. If you go to thick then weight of tenergy rubber may become an issue.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Tenergy 05 and 64 from first time perspective | Table Tennis
I think I have had much better luck with the T05 blocks than you but less success with the loops. Not that the loops don't work but I just play too close to the table to let the loops drop and I have probably adapted to blocking faster because I play close to the table.. I flip but don't really loop unless I am screwing around and playing back. I am more of a counter drive person.
I have never played with T64 so I found that part interesting.
via tenergy05.com
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
most popular pages at tenergy club 2010
spin art is super popular:
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
t05 fx
[QUOTE=debraj]Boz...
[/QUOTE]
05FX is better at punching? ???
now i really feel its weird, but i hope you are right. you said:
- it serves well (not as spinny as T05)
- its easy to open loops
- its easy to flick serves
- its easy to block
- now its easy to punch
while some of these charecteristics, i used to think, are contradictory; if they really embody in a single rubber ..... why the heck would i not use that rubber (BH) for eternity?
that's all I need in my BH .... and of course push.
- I think for long serves it creates some weird effects for me, it some times with confidence something I feel will be super long sill just barely pass off the end of the line.
05 is better in its hardness for feeling stable without huge bounciness.
open loops for sure just as you can with any rubber - spin didnt bother me nor did my spin bother them except they seemed to think I had more spin than i did.
again flick NO (roll the ball back YES)
flick is better with something that will actually go forward
Then again what is a flick? If you just flat hit the ball t25 is better.
Punch for sure 05 fx almost makes you have to punch into the ball to get the ball onto the table.
I don't like this. t64 had a nicer gradual blend between punch and loop.
push? sometimes great and short and low some times nasty bounce.
Debraj - I'm pretty sure I'll be going back to t64 once i wear out the 2 sheets of 05 fx. I know you will try this rubber no matter what anyone says. But just for the record I have a feeling most players will try this rubber out of the success of the original and then just go back to the original or t64.
table tennis news
Sunday, July 4, 2010
limb wood in table tennis
Limba wood is a piece of good table tennis. Using limba wood became popular in 1950 on guitar. It is considered a timber in West Africa. limba wood, even replaced the wood like mahogany, for its straight grain and dark color. Changes in Limba wood color over time. Therefore, it is difficult to identify limba woods for their color. The wood is soft limbo. However, you can create a sense of softness to the leaf itself. When used with other facets, limba sheet may seem difficult. The Limba have excellent acoustic properties, and the good atmosphere that makes this such an excellent wood for table tennis blades. The thin layer limba leaves are used in table tennis are very popular for topspin game. The wood acoustic sound, click sound when used with speed glue rubbers fact, is the vibration or flex is loved by players of Top Spin. The thicker, increasing the ability to attack
Saturday, July 3, 2010
table tennis table news
There are many table tennis table clearance sales in Australia and the number one is still number one. Michael Maze has changed his blade and I must say sorry for being down. Tenergy underspin is no problem because 05 fx is not affected by spin. If any questions please ask after you read the following.
tenergy05.com is down sorry
I have no idea why my website is down. I have contacted crazy domains about it but will have to be patient.
butterfly tenergy control
Control in what?
I feel more control in attacking backhand or forehand with butterfly tenergy 05.
I feel more control in doing anything a few steps back from the table with 05 or 64.
I feel more control serving and pushing with 05.
I feel more control doing an opening flick on a ball that would bounce twice and that is lower than the net with 05.
I feel most control blocking with 64 on backhand.
The only thing I really like right now is doing an opening loop that is just clearing the base line with 05 fx but that felt pretty dam good with 64 but not as spinny.
I feel more control in attacking backhand or forehand with butterfly tenergy 05.
I feel more control in doing anything a few steps back from the table with 05 or 64.
I feel more control serving and pushing with 05.
I feel more control doing an opening flick on a ball that would bounce twice and that is lower than the net with 05.
I feel most control blocking with 64 on backhand.
The only thing I really like right now is doing an opening loop that is just clearing the base line with 05 fx but that felt pretty dam good with 64 but not as spinny.
Friday, July 2, 2010
Japan Open Day 1
The beginning caught my eye this difficult. New hall, new conditions, unknown enemy, because it is a never easy to come right into the passages. But in the end I have my opponent Wong Chun Ting from Hong Kong and noshade Alamiyan relatively safe from Iran had under control. Before that I had never seen the two, but fortunately I have not underestimated, because now we must take no one on the Pro Tour series too easy.
Tomorrow I will, however, very difficult. In the fourth round against me is my ex-colleague, Seiya Kishikawa Borussia, which is not at all to me. At the World Championships I was able to bring the game almost home, I hope I can do tomorrow!
Tomorrow I will, however, very difficult. In the fourth round against me is my ex-colleague, Seiya Kishikawa Borussia, which is not at all to me. At the World Championships I was able to bring the game almost home, I hope I can do tomorrow!
japan open
After only four hours sleep and eight hours travel I arrived in Kobe at the Japan Open. Today I will let me rest a bit and deal with. Have suffered a slight muscle soreness from yesterday's game, otherwise it goes to me but good. Tomorrow we go with Round 1 and 2 Reinhängen again before I finally leave.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)